 |
Caled
Sorcerer
Joined: 21 Oct 2000
Posts: 821
Location: Australia
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 2:30 pm
a question of speed: reparse trigs
|
I'm curious as to which would be quicker, if either? For anyone not sure, you -can- use reparse trigger states in this manner. It seems reliable. I hope I got all the syntax correct, as I wrote this example straight from my head. If its a little wrong, please just try to assume I got it right?
| Code: |
#TR "IDname" {Pattern to begin} {}
#COND {*} {} {manual}
#COND {One of twenty or so messages} {varname=something} {reparse}
#COND {Another of twenty or so messages} {anothervarname=something} {reparse}
...
...
#COND {A pattern to end this} {anAlias;#STATE IDname 0} {reparse} |
OR
| Code: |
#CLASS {classname}
#TR {pattern to begin} {#T+ classname2}
#CLASS {classname|classname2}
#TR {One of twenty or so messages} {varname=something}
#TR {Another of twenty or so messages} {anothervarname=something}
...
...
#TR {A pattern to end this.} {anAlias;#T- classname2}
#CLASS 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
DeReP
Adept
Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 222
Location: Chile
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:16 pm
|
I would go with the second one, looks tidier that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
