Author |
Message |
Topic: Crimson2 mud - answering machine script |
superbovine
Replies: 0
Views: 5941
|
Forum: Finished MUD Scripts Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 8:32 pm Subject: Crimson2 mud - answering machine script |
Ok, wrote this script. i called it an answering script. i am biasing off of this script http://www.zuggsoft.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=8698
ok i got the idea from here, only made it for tell an ... |
Topic: Crimson 2 Mud Rahnkara (healer) finding script |
superbovine
Replies: 0
Views: 5973
|
Forum: Finished MUD Scripts Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 8:31 pm Subject: Crimson 2 Mud Rahnkara (healer) finding script |
OK, what this script does is from a certain room in the mud, the script walks my character to a zone, and walks around and finds the healer. The healer does not have a static position so she must be ... |
Topic: variable syntax question |
superbovine
Replies: 1
Views: 3436
|
Forum: zMUD General Discussion Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:56 am Subject: variable syntax question |
what i want to do is to emulate this:
tell 1.thief hi
tell 2.thief hi
etc.
so i make this alias
#al tmob {tell @counterVar.%1 hi}
i am having trouble with the period. it is not letting the va ... |
Topic: problem in zmud.exe 6.62 |
superbovine
Replies: 3
Views: 4644
|
Forum: zMUD General Discussion Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2003 3:36 am Subject: problem in zmud.exe 6.62 |
ok i had a brown out, now my zmud won't work
i get this error:
ZMUD.EXE !
Sorry, could not get a license at this time. Please try running this program later.
23
0K
this is the first and la ... |
Topic: help wit %if |
superbovine
Replies: 2
Views: 3463
|
Forum: zMUD General Discussion Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:35 am Subject: help wit %if |
you da shiznit!
|
Topic: help wit %if |
superbovine
Replies: 2
Views: 3463
|
Forum: zMUD General Discussion Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2003 1:43 am Subject: help wit %if |
this is the trigger pattern:
^Rahnkara the Highpriestess leaves (%1).(%2)
%1 can be north, south, east, or west
so for example:
Rahnkara the Highpriestess leaves north.
would be a valid statem ... |
|